Clinical predictors of response to Atezolizumab-bevacizumab in Child-Pugh B patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Auteurs

Anne Victoire Odent, Claudia Campani, Mohamed Bouattour, Yann Touchefeu, Victoria Delhoume, Olivier Rosmorduc, Alina Pascale, Jihyun An, Han Chu Lee, Hélène Regnault, Dominique Thabut, Giuliana Amaddeo, Massih Ningararhi, Isabelle Olivier-Hourmand, Chloe Metivier, Maxime Ronot, Line Ntandja-Wandji, Violaine Ozenne, Sabrina Sidali, Fabio Marra, Clémence Hollande, Nathalie Ganne-Carrié, Pierre Nahon, Jean-Marie Peron, Marie Lequoy, Rohini Sharma; Paris Liver Cancer Group; Eric Trepo, Sarah Mouri, Manon Allaire, Ju Hyun Shim, Jean-Charles Nault

JHEP Reports 2026 June
11:101915.

Online ahead of print.

PMID: 42276190

DOI: 0.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101915.

Free article.

Pour accéder à l’article, cliquez sur le lien: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42276190/

Résumé

Background & aims: We aimed to identify, among patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and Child-Pugh B cirrhosis, typically excluded from clinical trials, a subgroup that may benefit from first-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab (A/B).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective international multicenter study including patients with unresectable HCC treated with first-line A/B between 2020 and 2024 across 12 centers. A cohort of Child-Pugh B patients treated with sorafenib served as a control. Baseline clinical, biological, and tumor features were correlated with radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Among 1499 patients, 246 (16.4%) had Child-Pugh B cirrhosis. Within Child-Pugh B, 72% were B7, 21.5% B8, and 6.5% B9; 73% had ALBI grade 2 and 27% grade 3. Median OS and PFS were significantly shorter in Child-Pugh B (8.1 and 5.2 months) versus Child-Pugh A (16.8 and 8.6 months; both p<0.001). Two-year OS was 20% for Child-Pugh B versus 38% for Child-Pugh A. Child-Pugh B patients treated with A/B had longer OS than those treated with sorafenib (p=0.002). A score combining ALBI grade 1/2 and metastatic status identified prognostic subgroups (10.3 vs 7.9 vs 4.2 months; p<0.0001). Improvement to Child-Pugh A occurred in 31% and was associated with recent treatment of underlying liver disease. Radiological response (HR=0.58, p=0.021) and liver function improvement (HR=0.59, p=0.006) correlated with reduced mortality.

Conclusion: Although Child-Pugh B patients have poorer survival, a subgroup, those with ALBI grade 1/2 and no extrahepatic metastasis, can derive meaningful benefit from A/B therapy. Improving underlying liver disease may contribute to better outcomes.

Impacts and implications: Child-Pugh B patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma are systematically underrepresented in clinical trials, creating a critical evidence gap for a population frequently encountered in real-world practice. This large multicenter study shows that a subset of these patients, those with ALBI grade 1/2 and without extrahepatic metastases, can have clinically significant benefit from first-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab, providing a practical prognostic tool to guide patient selection. Moreover, the association between treatment of the underlying liver disease and Child-Pugh class improvement suggests that optimizing hepatic function alongside systemic therapy may represent an actionable strategy to improve outcomes, warranting prospective validation.

Keywords: ALBI; Child Pugh B; hepatocellular carcinoma; immunotherapy; liver function.

Sommaire